<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we entering the &quot;Cognitive Age&quot;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adambohannon.org/are-we-entering-the-cognitive-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adambohannon.org/are-we-entering-the-cognitive-age/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strange Legacy &#187; The Nature of Human Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.adambohannon.org/are-we-entering-the-cognitive-age/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Strange Legacy &#187; The Nature of Human Intelligence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abo46n2.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] For the sake of argument I’ll stick with a very simple, and probably incomplete definition; intelligence is an individual’s capacity to receive and process information in useful ways.  With this in mind, the question I would rather consider is this: “What makes one person more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For the sake of argument I’ll stick with a very simple, and probably incomplete definition; intelligence is an individual’s capacity to receive and process information in useful ways.  With this in mind, the question I would rather consider is this: “What makes one person more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abo46n2</title>
		<link>http://www.adambohannon.org/are-we-entering-the-cognitive-age/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>abo46n2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abo46n2.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out Shirky&#039;s post, hadn&#039;t seen that - love what he says about social lubricant.  If gin was the lubricant for social change during the industrial revolution and television was the lubricant for social change in post-war America, what will be the lubricant for social change in the information age?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out Shirky&#8217;s post, hadn&#8217;t seen that &#8211; love what he says about social lubricant.  If gin was the lubricant for social change during the industrial revolution and television was the lubricant for social change in post-war America, what will be the lubricant for social change in the information age?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.adambohannon.org/are-we-entering-the-cognitive-age/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abo46n2.wordpress.com/?p=50#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Michael Lewis expressed a similar sentiment in one of his books, &lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.raganwald.com/2008/04/why-we-are-biggest-obstacle-to-our-own.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;as recounted here&lt;/a&gt;. I suppose &quot;crystalized intelligence&quot; could be synonymous to the &quot;self&quot;, given how the latter is largely a perspective on how we view the world which is necessarily informed by the framework of concepts we&#039;ve built to deal with it. Lewis characterized fluidity as a fantastic tool to deal with industry-overturning paradigm-shifts (to use an icky phrase), but the pulse is quickening and similar shifts occuring so often as to blur together these days. It&#039;s really rather stressful, which is why I&#039;m dubious of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shirky.com/herecomeseverybody/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Shirky&#039;s implication that our &quot;social surplus&quot; will eventually be freed&lt;/a&gt; from the coping mechanisms it&#039;s currently invested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Lewis expressed a similar sentiment in one of his books, <a href="http://weblog.raganwald.com/2008/04/why-we-are-biggest-obstacle-to-our-own.html" rel="nofollow">as recounted here</a>. I suppose &#8220;crystalized intelligence&#8221; could be synonymous to the &#8220;self&#8221;, given how the latter is largely a perspective on how we view the world which is necessarily informed by the framework of concepts we&#8217;ve built to deal with it. Lewis characterized fluidity as a fantastic tool to deal with industry-overturning paradigm-shifts (to use an icky phrase), but the pulse is quickening and similar shifts occuring so often as to blur together these days. It&#8217;s really rather stressful, which is why I&#8217;m dubious of <a href="http://www.shirky.com/herecomeseverybody/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html" rel="nofollow">Shirky&#8217;s implication that our &#8220;social surplus&#8221; will eventually be freed</a> from the coping mechanisms it&#8217;s currently invested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
